>>2943530 (lb)
Why? I've seen the name Fiona Hill for a couple of days while phonefagging, but haven't figured out why she's important. Help a first-cup-of-coffee anon out?
>>2943530 (lb)
Why? I've seen the name Fiona Hill for a couple of days while phonefagging, but haven't figured out why she's important. Help a first-cup-of-coffee anon out?
Thanks anon.
Heard rumblings early on that it was to trap the NYT. And it looks like that's exactly what's happened.
Double down on the bwahahahah.
And time for a second cup o joe.
Suffering smartass here.
Yes, the overall is so complex it takes a few real geniuses to step away from being overwhelmed and break it down to achieve the goal. In addition, law, like so much of America, gets scooped in to what's popular in order to make the goal. There are laws, important laws, that have been ignored for years in order to facilitate our collapse.
Break it down.
Map the path.
Find the laws.
Make them stick.
That's why this journey is so damn slow.
Or, his trip to Iran?
Know a guy who knows a guy who knows him. A real goodie-two-shoes, which automatically makes him suspect.
I am quite convinced that like Bourdain, NONE OF THEM were allowed to be famous without cabal blessing.
How many people have picked up a book and physically FOLLOWED Steves all around the world?
"They thought you would follow the stars."
Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, too. A candidate, though.
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/08/645882787/brazilian-candidate-recovering-from-stabbing-may-be-gaining-an-advantage
Dang I love POTUS. (no homo disclosure not required)
Good grief is this team bright. That was from end of February, first of March.
Six months later (hmmmm) NYT's is defending Sessions as "America's attorney general."
Six months. A complete 180. See also Q clock?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/04/opinion/editorials/trump-sessions-midterms-tweet.html
Yeah. That requires the second cup of coffee.
NYT
Maggie Haberman is the WH correspondent.
Was on the list of dirty journos we got from Q?
Deleted Twitter account.
Now it's tied to this anonymous (perhaps Fiona Hill /ourguys/) drop.
Anons?
Oooh. Wait.
Haberman was fed the letter written by POTUS/Fiona Hill and published as anonymous.
She's cabal from childhood - likely in the bloodline - likely abused.
It's confusing sometimes when instinct reminds me that so many of (((them))) are victims, too.
"The people you can't talk bad about are the ones controlling you."
Revisionist history. Jews.
Does make anon a little dizzy considering the options at hand.
Man in the High Castle.
Getting the book this week to plow through it.
There's a there there.
What wonderful Sunday Morning breakfast bread.
Sunday mornings are usually concernfagging 101.
Glad to see it's missing so far.
We dug the family last February.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/30/the-family-that-built-an-empire-of-pain
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a12775932/sackler-family-oxycontin/
That story from Esquire will change your life.
This is likely why so many book clubs are reading various feel-good stories on WWII.
Narrative is vulnerable, so reinforce it with the housewives.