>until they pumped up with IV Cocaine and Meth
Hitlers use of drugs sounds like propaganda from the enemy to me.
>Then he was an easy target for mind control via his megalomania.
Same.
>Those are well documented medical facts. Not rare to use them for bad humor, headaches, etc..
What's the difference between facts and propaganda?
>Shill.
So asking what the difference is between fact and propaganda makes you a shill? You are not pro free speech, that's for sure.
Democracy is one step closer to tyranny. That's why the dark forces are trying to convince everybody that democracy is something positive worth protecting.
What comes after a revolution? A REPUBLIC, NOT DEMOCRACY!
Anarchy (temporary until laws are created) Republic > Democracy > Tyranny.
>So wherever Q's going with the "nazism" crumbs, I can't see it leading anywhere that asks us to ultimately embrace Jewish rule or their destructive narratives
Q is avoiding the Israel/Jews topic entirely. My theory is that Israel — a country created by the Jews — will be dismantled and the land return to its previous owners (mainly Palestine). That is also the reason why the Trump administration moved the embassy to Jerusalem; after Israel cease to exist, the embassy will be in the capital of Palestine Jerusalem and not in the capital of the Jews (Tel Aviv). That might be the "end game".
Plenty of shills in here today accusing patriots of being shills.
>The Party is degenerating into an orgy of hate, violence and extreme socialism.
They are showing their true self out of desperation.
Ever tried to confront a sociopath? Same thing; they loose their shit when their manipulation doesn't work. Funny as hell, and a powerful tool to have.
>Joe Kennedy was absolutely a nazi backer. His tenure as ambassador to the UK shows this very clearly.
>
>However, children are allowed to have different viewpoints than their parents, aren't they?
JFK came from a privileged bloodline and therefor was allowed to become president. Little did they know he had a good heart and would not play ball according to their rules. So he was terminated.
Yes it does. But to the power hungry psychopaths, nothing is off-limit. Murder is nothing when they have a history of committing genocide.
>I speak from experience, it's scary as shit. No holds barred when a psycho has lost control.
Not if you know how to control them and not let them control you.
>It's a good theory. Q said "Saving Israel for Last" in context of dealing with problem nations, so it's safe to assume he sees it as a problem that he intends to solve in some way.
Keep your friends close and your enemy closer.
No need to fight multiple battles on multiple fronts when you can kill them off one at a time. Israel/the Jews is the boss for winning the game.
Which would be bad. France is still controlled by the Deep State. Are they on the Iraqi (Deep State ) side of the border?
Are they allowed in Syria? I think not.
>Third, all revisionist truthers have researched thousands of verifiable facts that comprise our understanding of WWII and Hitler's Germany. This is why we believe what we believe. We don't just go on faith of one association.
There were more Jews in Europe after WWII then before the war started. That is a fact that has not been scrubbed and can be verified in literature. That fact alone proves the Holocaust is a hoax. And there are plenty more…
Not time?
"In all of German-occupied Europe, there resided 2.4 million jews before the war, according to the World Jewish Encyclopedia. After the war, 3.8 million jewish "Holocaust Survivors" were receiving pensions from the German government.
Tragically, the remaining 6 million were lost."
— Edgar J. Steele
Agreed.
If what we believe are correct, Obama pardoned himself and his partners in crime before leaving the presidency. That is why I think McCain is the only one that has been convicted for treason and executed; McCain is a former veteran and the military oath is for life. McCain could therefor face trial in a military tribunal. A president can only make federal pardons, not state or military.
So we are not allowed to discuss things that has not yet happened?
>Mainly cuz the theory is still so speculative.
-
Have you heard of a better theory? I'd like to hear it.
-
The only option to speculate is to not talk about it. I prefer speculation.
All indications indicates the revolutionists (the US military) plan on doing it in full; including abolishing IRS, FED, EU and Israel among other things.
Expect winning and freedom.
As Q has stated, they won't mention the reason. So we can only analyze what we know; the history of Israel, the Jews and their place in the Deep State scheme. If the end game is destroying the Deep State, Israel must be destroyed.
Q and POTUS can not talk about it, because that would be giving away information to your enemy.
Moving the embassy fits my theory better than the official explanation; it is positive for the discussions between Israel and Palestine. That is pure bullshit.
Also, the EO going into effect 1/1 2019 about military tribunals is important. It sidesteps Obamas pardons in some aspects, but not in full. Nullifying Obamas presidency will however, and POTUS has mentioned the Obama birth certificate debacle. So I think that will happen sometime in the not to distant future.
Obama could pardon all crimes committed up until he left the presidency. So he would only have to mention names, not the crimes.
The "mistakes" (read illegalities) they committed are numerous. The reason why they are not exposed is that we are still in the evidence collecting phase. There are signs that this phase is about to end.
To bad, I'd like to hear it. Any information that can be used to "defend" my position is appreciated.
It is not.
POTUS is the representative of the revolution, not the leader; the military is.
No. Why should it? A PATRIOT is a PATRIOT, military or not.
History has shown that when shit hits the fan, the military always defends its people.
Note: Do not mistake mercenaries or other forms of paid-for soldiers for military.
Without knowing who the source is, for me it's an obvious trap. AS Q said; trolling is fun.
+1
Looks like bots to me.
Somebody has been watching the Al Smith charity speech…
>Haberman was fed the letter written by POTUS/Fiona Hill and published as anonymous.