>I'll be honest, Q lost some of my trust by trying to claim it's NOT a coincidence that the file name of that twitter picture started with DOITQ… He implied that it was by design… that it was an engineered thing… that it was a SIGNAL… But twitter GENERATES those image names when you upload to twitter. It doesn't matter what YOUR file name is, the file name is a randomized hash… So when Q posted on 9/6 that the "DOITQ" file name start was a 1 in billion coincidence, as if it were by design, and done as a wink and nod to Q directly from POTUS?
The ability to manipulate the file name assigned by twitter implies military are engaged. There exist classified technologies that can manipulate data in flight through EM signalling. There exist technologies that can manipulate the content of server storage. Also it would be possible, feasible, for MI to know the exact algorithm Twitter uses, and simulate it, and thereby force assignment of a specific filename (if the filename is a cryptographic hash of an input string along with other twitter-specific data and/or timestamp).
Anons do not worship Q. However we do apply what we know of technology and logic, to reach probable conclusions.
Now go away with your FUD.