>>2948953

>Q saying that anons questioning Hannity is a shill tactic is disturbing

Someone show me where Q said that

All I see is Q replying to a post, which ALSO said:

>Q has directly told us to watch Hannity.

>Q also links us to Sara Carter, who is literally on Hannity every single night.

>Hannity is a patriot.

That's 4 statements, 3 of which are being COMPLETELY IGNORED, while the red text (New shill tactic is to smear Sean Hannity) gets the focus. What is the purpose of a laser pointer? It's worked obviously…

Why presume that Q agreed with everything in the post? Mighty selective of anons to ignore the rest, ain't it?

>>2949058

Does he think that? Or do his bosses tell him to say that? Or, has he been instructed to say nothing until it's time to?

Why are RESEARCHERS not thinking beyond the face value of what media tells them?

ARE YOU AWAKE?

DO YOU THINK FOR YOURSELF?

>>2949105

ANON called you guys shills, not Q. Get over it.

>>2949099

Easier read

>>2949122

So, when Q replies to a post, it's automatic confirmation of EVERYTHING In said post?

Should've learned better than that from day one, Expanded thinking yet, or waiting for Q to confirm every thought you have? Post #1 very related

>>2949126

What purpose would hate serve?

>Emotion clouds judgement.

>Logical thinking ELIMINATES emotional nonsense.

Funny how Q emphasizes LOGICAL thinking, yet can stoke emotion in SOOOOOO many. Q's posts are so powerful that he can actually make emotional wrecks tell the truth on themselves!

>>2949209

You get it, anon. I've stated time & time again that anons need to stop taking hopium in any form, in order to manage their expectations. Otherwise, when reality doesn't match what folks have in their heads, confusion & frustration are bound to be the result. Looks the same to me as women screaming at the TV watching a soap opera, as if that will change what's already been filmed.

>>2949250

I keep it on the ready

>>2949268

>Hannity must not be labeled a "Conspiracty Theorist"

THIS

>>2949301

In these eyes, ALL are welcome, and none are above correction, this anon included.

>>2949308

Touch a nerve, much?

Try harder.

>>2949326

Cynicism & skepticism get two different results. As a former cynic, only ended up believing in nothing. Downgrading back to a skeptic keeps healthy boundaries & still filters nonsense, as opposed to filtering everything, makes one look past what's right in front of them.

>>2949357

Agreed.

Specific timing rests w/ POTUS.

The buck stops with POTUS, period.

>>2949358

Try logic, ad hominems don't suit you well.

>>2949365

>not about 'hopium' it's about understanding the multifaceted nature of the larger Op.

…

>Understanding that not all messages are for us, Hannity is not there to educate/entertain/inform us but a certain segment that needs to be slow-walked into acceptance is what is necessary.

Agreeing with all of the above

>>2949373

Great, nothing to hide.

>>2949398

Solid perspective

>>2949413

← No harm done

>>2949434

So, tell me something new.

>>2949453

Thank me later

>>2949489

>We're all stuck on this planet together, so for the love of God, play nice.

Ok, you got me there. Peace, anon