>>2959420 lb
>you're using too many words.
Isn't this something kids do? Especially growing up, humans will shame people that are smarter than them due to their own insecurities. Do you know what projection means? This just makes you look lazy. You're hard to take seriously.
>but polls?
It's easy. Read Don Jr's tweet again.
>I mean who cares about a few great Americans if you can score pol points?
Let's replace that "pol" with "poll":
>I mean who cares about a few great Americans if you can score poll points?
Weird how that makes sense, isn't it?
Alright, let's do POTUS's tweet next, shall we?
>Phony books, articles and T.V. “hits” like no other pol has had to endure-and they are losing big.
Sure, this one might be sort of a stretch, but we are looking for needless in haystacks here, aren't we?
>Phony books, articles and T.V. “hits” like no other poll has had to endure-and they are losing big.
This is the only part where I can sort of see you having a point. See, grammatically, this sentence makes sense. It surely fits with the syntax. The issue is, however, is that the sentence doesn't exactly make a lot of sense. Then, the question arises of whether or not they worded these things (in unison or not) in such a way where they were capable of making a sort of hint.
Anyway, the reason you were so tedious is because you're forcing me to show you things that are seemingly far out of your intellectual reach. Why else would you need me to explain them to you? Maybe in the future, go prove people wrong and think things out before you type them, instead of making an ass out of yourself in claiming someone is wrong about something and then demanding they prove you wrong.
Have you forgotten where you are, anon? Maybe you need to lurk moar. Remember who you're talking to here.