One of the most fascinating elements of Q and this board is the fact that after all this time, there are still very important facets for which there is no consensus (and some discord). Frustrating yes, but really it underscores the genius of this whole operation.
Example:
“If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.”
Q
Very simple, right? Except that Q isn’t known for bluntly stating the obvious. Q posts to make us think, so there is always the potential for necessary misinformation, double meanings, or other cryptic
Regardless of where you stand, mathematically there are only 4 possible outcomes:
A. Both are dirty
B. RR is cooperating, Mueller is dirty
C. Mueller is cooperating, RR is dirty
D. Both are cooperating
Examining each relative to Q’s statement above.
A. Both are dirty.
-
Case for: This obvious, and there is ample evidence that they are!
-
Case against: This is too obvious. And given that it’s blatantly clear to even the casual observer that they are dirty, why would Q feel the need to state the obvious?
B. RR is cooperating, and Mueller is dirty.
-
Case for: can't come up with much here, other than there is so much we don't know and anything is possible.
-
Case against: RR clearly signed the FISC doc, and has pretty much lived inside the [ ] kill box. “FlyRRFly”, “RR problems”, and too many other direct and indirect mentions by Q
C. Mueller is cooperating, and RR is dirty.
-
Case for: The dirty RR is well established. But a case can be made for Mueller cooperating. The meeting with POTUS before being named SC, former US Marine, and several other hints. Plus, Q has been especially cryptic around the topic of Mueller while he has been more direct with all other black hats.
-
Case against: Mueller stacked his team with partisans. Mueller has gone after Trump’s people, but doesn’t seem to have explored Hussein and his DOJ’s obvious hand in manufacturing the Russia narrative.
D. Both are cooperating.
-
Case for: Trump and team could very well have designed a sting so complex and genius that even anons have been fooled. Black hats watch this board, and Q has mentioned that some misinformation is necessary. The Art of War.
-
Case against: Ample evidence that they are both part of the DS, and working diligently to advance the interests of the cabal.
As for me, I have pretty much ruled out any scenario where RR is cooperating, thus B and D are out. That only leaves A & C. Personally I’m on the fence, and would probably handicap it as A = 40% and B = 60%. But this will change as the shitstorm hits with full-force gale winds.