Anonymous ID: b96857 Sept. 10, 2018, 2:10 p.m. No.2963511   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3624 >>3903

>>2963434

With POTUS posting BEFORE Q, it seems this proof is flawed. An anon asked for a zero delta. Q could simply have had a script running to watch for the next POTUS tweet and post a Q post as soon as POTUS tweet hit. 10 seconds is cutting it pretty close, but it seems possible

If it were the other way around, with Q posting then POTUS posting 10 seconds later, we'd have a much more convincing proof.

Of course I was sold at "+++" and "Wonderful Day."