dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

[RR] response under oath to Rep. Gaetz when asked if he actually read the FISA app before signing it:

“We sit down with a team of attorneys from the Department of Justice. All of whom review that and provide a briefing for us for what’s in it. And I’ve reviewed that one in some detail, and I can tell you the information that’s public about that doesn’t match with my understanding of the one that I signed, but I think it’s appropriate to let the Inspector General complete that investigation. These are serious allegations. I don’t do the investigation — I’m not the affiant. I’m reviewing the finished product, sir.”

So [RR] claims he reviewed “in some detail” a doc that had evidence other than the dossier for requesting the FISA warrant?? Liar. He then throws it back in the lap of the FBI who did “do the investigation” and by stating that he did not sign as the affiant, he throws the one who did sign as affiant, under the bus. Although redacted, we can assume the affiant was fired FBI agent, Peter Strzok who’s title was SSA and the only one of the four signers who signs “under penalty of perjury”.

[RR] was doing a CYA knowing it’s a matter of time before they’re exposed, but screwed up by stating he viewed/signed a doc with evidence other than the dossier as McCabe has previously stated under oath that without the HRC paid for fake dossier there would have been no FISA warrant. They had nothing else. When the FISA docs are eventually DECLAS [RR] is the next head to roll along with whoever the 4th redacted DoJ signer is unless they’re already gone along with McCabe and Strzok. That leaves [RR] who with all other conspirators will be looking at perjury and treason for plotting a coup to remove a duly elected POTUS.