>>296626

But old hag Nancy in the house is not going to let her dems vote yea for this without Ryan Paul making some sort of promise to protect the daca people.

Has anybody found the comments from Carl Ghattas and Joshua Skule whom apparently had severe biases while being involved in the Trump and Michael Flynn investigations.

>>296677

Shepard Smith, yes?

There's your answer.

>>296785

Is Kim Ghattas Carl Ghattas' wife?

Jim Baker and Carl Ghattas on Section 702

Audio interview

www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-lawfare-podcast/e/50946743?autoplay=true

Interesting audio file concerning the Section 702 and how they obtained a database.

Carl Ghattas was being interviewed.

Makes me wonder if Q's post 673 is related to this.

>>284004

https:// www.fbi.gov/about/leadership-and-structure/fbi-executives/carl-ghattas

Q

>>296999

Are you listening to this crap?

They don't have to go get a warrant if there is probable cause for section 702 as well.

Baker, could you add this to the batter under the 'Q TASK 3 - GHATTAS' section?

Am listening to audio now, and it concerns the process of the Section 702. Interviewing Carl Ghattas.

>>296963

>>296567

>>297074

>>296567

May add this under the 'Q TASK 3 - GHATTAS' as well.

www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/JW-v-DOJ-McCabe-ethics-01494-pg-4-7.pdf

>>297132

She is in the house, not senate.

>>297149

>Still surprised she can stand and carry a conversation for 7+ hours though

That makes 2 of us! Kek!

She fails this, and they'll be calling it the Pelosi Shutdown…KEK!

>>297241

I'm sure we can whip up a SEAL Team right quick, if need be.

>>297273

Because her daca base the last time they passed a CR, came to her place and yelled at her, went to Schumer's house and protested as well.

>>297279

presidential directives could be the stringer's pre_D

>>297329

Whew! That pdf was interesting.