>>296625

aren't these booms just fighter jets going supersonic at a high altitude?

>>296703

I had trouble with this one too, recently [WAR]locks was said, I believe this to in part suggest the Military Tribunal that has been formed.

>>296763

yeah, well no offense, but "re-read crumbs" is NOT helpful to spreading information that people may be struggling with, we're here for a reason anon, if you have THE answer, it would take less time to just say it than your passive aggressive feminine response.

>>296806

was that so hard?

No, instead some anons would prefer to turn a board dedicated to the dissemination and spreading of info into a higherachy of hidden knowledge.

>>296823

I'm suggesting that we shouldn't engage in occult-like (hidden knowledge) tactics with other anons, saying X=Y isn't difficult when someone has a simple question.

>>296845

This, this response took 10x's more effort to write than simply saying X=Y. I don't care if it's posted a million times, what I'm suggesting is the culture of snubbing other anons when you could simply ANSWER them is annoying and exactly the tactics of our enemies.

>>296901

If the answer takes less energy than the rebuke (as it did in this specific instance) I see no point in being coy about simply giving it.

>>296929

Sometimes it takes petitions a while to catch-up because people have to verify their signatures via email confirmation. I noticed this too.