>>2968542

>>2968589

The vampire was based on the ("blood libel"as jews call it) jews kidnapping people, torturing them, circumcising little boys and draining their blood to drink. It's real, they've been doing this for a long, long, long time, not just in Europe either.

The original 'fairy tales' were really scary cautionary tales, if you look at the originals. They were not nicey bedtime stories.

Once the media was developed (and overtaken - see An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Created Hollywood - written by a jew), they were able to distort what our wise ancestors tried to tell us - the warnings they gave us were denuded into nonsense.

Why do you think they would do that?

>>2968716

>>2968734

great job

>>2968786

>would be awesome to make one dropping truth bombs about what they've done

YES, would be very effective if added

>>2968916

>this will go faster if dems/libs think it’s their idea.

USE anything and everything at our disposal

pic absolutely related

>>2969079

No normies know what Moloch is, and "ruling families' and "elites" are just different versions of Alex Jones' "globalists" - efforts to cover up who they really are, avoid saying who they really are, like your friend wants to do, and probably for the same reason.

That's why we say who they are directly, that's why certain people don't like it and want to corral us back into mindless generalities or even make up new bullshit pseudonyms like "hivites" to avoid just saying the word.

>>2969006

Why hasn't anyone here asked the obvious questions:

HOW was Omarosa able to record convos in the WH?

WHO gave her the tech?

The answers should be obvious in general, but the specifics are something for /ourguys/

That bitch had help, /ourguys/ know how & who, and are now publishing that countermeasures have been taken, so previous means & methods (by clowns) are ineffective.

>>2969293

Oscar worthy?

Future running mate?

>>2969302

Actually it is, that's their problem isn't it? That's why the push is continually for euphemisms, to deflect, to shift the blame/attention to others.

That's not working anymore is it?

This is why there is a renewed push to go back to those generalities, to deflection and even new BS euphemisms.

NO. We tell the truth, we name them DIRECTLY and OPENLY and without any hesitation whatsoever.

You and your buddy from prior threads are trying a different tack in this one I notice. Others notice, too.