>>3685604

You are nowhere near understanding how the book of Romans applies to the world today. Nobody is. The reason is because it was written in the "typical of all Scripture" prose of the God that "exists to exist again" (I am that I am) - meaning it had application and validity for a time past, and has another "time" yet to be understood in a whole other paradigm (when the points of it then apply in similar ways but to very different entities).

If you want to get on the path of that, you should pick up with where this guy is:

>>3697893

Notice the different sets of laws we progress through in time. Add to this the times established by Moses for this to happen. The time of the son of man is the present. It began after the time of man (six days, or 6,000 years, from 4004 BC to 1996 AD). Numerous other measures of time in the Bible also confirm and explain this. They are found here:

https://cog49.com/ft.pdf

The seven laws of the son of man are also thoroughly treated therein. They are the laws of nature, and a much higher "system of" law than those of man or the ten commandments. We have in fact, lived under them our entire existence, but have not known them. They now present themselves in our history all the way back to Moses in Egypt and beyond. The last dozen or so pages of that writing portray how we pick up "conformity" with them more nationally in the present - to our own blessing. The rest of the book goes back through history to show the pivotal points that teach them, and further describe them in a great many ways.

And the whole presentation begins in chapter one with this posted portion of the Essene gospel of peace, among other concurrent works.

>>3712342

Now, now. think about it. The key here is TIME.

People in different times have different needs and experiences, which causes them to derive from Scripture differently, as well as to NEED form Scripture differently. That is what changes everything. The words do not change. The meanings behind them do. And as society changes too, the values of different meanings come and go drastically. This is what makes canon "live.".

>>3716134

Now you are getting there.

Yes, only one time for the adversary, but many for the saved.

The many also end, which is where we are today - at the end (or rather beyond) the three and a part.

Time (as we have always known it) is now past. Eternity has begun.

That "angel" (messenger) you mentioned has sounded, and many on this board have "heard" it and are astonished.

There is an immense study of Scripture on this, posted here:

>>3706498

>>3739790

Why do you fly into a 40+ line sermon over one focused, pointed (you) I gave?

I imagined the issue of time was a possible door for you to find much greater understanding of Scripture.

Do you not wish any productive conversation?

Daily reminder 5:5

5:5 refers to the document that described this movement and appeared on 4chan 6 weeks before Q showed up.

Here is a partial synopsis: https://pastebin.com/gHDKKBjW

>>3854879

>drop the KJV. Study the bible in the original Greek, do not "read" the bible. Study it.

Exactly. This is what Paul "prophecies" to a future time (our time) by doing the same thing himself.

This is explained in the same document that follows this exact ultimatum and got us all where we are now.

p132 has Paul doing this in the section "Paul Goes to Rome."

>>3965910

here: http://cog49.com/ft.pdf

>>3965860

>>3965910

>>3965921