>>2969918 pb

A commercial aircraft is not a bullet.

It is hollow and made of Aluminum

It's light, because it has to be in order to fly

Even a bullet , if it hits steel, will flatten.

I won't just fly through steel without slowing down.

Are any bullets made of AL?

Also, just even more basic:

Steel , reinforced cement and 100's of thousands of tons of mass fastened into the ground, Beat Aluminum

Trump beats Hillary.

Steel beats Aluminum

I guess the dudes ignoring what I said.

, We have the tapes and the testimony of an expert aircraft engineer. Plane can't fly that fast as 700 ft. above sea level. Air is too heavy. Aircraft would pull itself apart. Too much stress.

That's just one forensic piece.

But the best evidence is the apparent seamless penetration of the "Commercial plane" into the Tower creating the cookie cutter cut-out effect, as though it were a "RoadRunner" cartoon

>>2970790

Thermite / Thermate is BS

It's a long story.

I wouldn't consider National Geographics as a reputable source.

Right up there with Popular Mechanics.

I would say "Thermite" is definitely not notable.

It was promoted by the fake 9/11 Truth movement. - that and "Bld. 7" will get them to heaven. NOT . And another 17 years of BS.

Controlled opposition.

Steven Jones who promoted it is totally compromised. He wrote a long paper explaining logically and according to laws of physics why the NIST and the official story had to be wrong.

Then at the end of the paper he wrote "But this doesn't prove it"

And claimed the only way to prove it would be to find "themite" at the site.

The sample he got was from a 9/11 truther - very scientific, wouldn't you say.

Without the physical evidence "nothing could be proved"

Well, he's already proved it, but announced he had not. Very tricky.

There's more to the story. Disgusting.

We call people who follow the thermite theory "Truthlings"

>>2971019