Da Breaddz.
Be multiplying!
Da Breaddz.
Be multiplying!
>>2970528 pb
Anons, I am fairly new to clockfagging; and had thought this to be total bs and a waste of time. Then one day, when McStain "died", I decided to try to understand it. I think the biggest set back people have with Clockfagging is that they see a bunch of colored lines and sometimes a Qlock can get fairly convoluted and immense.
Anyway, this clock from pb is absolute confirmation that the clock works and is a valid form of Qresearch (clockfaggers are perhaps the best Qresearchers on this board, beings they have to thumb through almost every crumb Q had ever posted!)
My very first try at Clockfagging I started out really slow and asked a lot of questions on how to do it and tried to grasp an understanding of what to do and how my Qclock graphics should look.
For my first attempt, and since McStain had just "died" and an Anon had just posted the 5:5:5 Qlock, I decided to Clockfag on McStain and I did something a little different from other Clockfaggots and their Clockfaggotry: I asked an Anon what time McStain died and they replied "4:28".
Needless to say, I set the Qlock to 4:28 and began searching crumbs along those lines.
I got goosebumps when I started getting hits on McStain, and then I saw BYE BYE, JOHNNY!
Everything got really quiet in my head when I seen that and it felt almost like I was having an out-of-body experience; almost like I was in a dream that this was even happening!
So, to any anons that are skeptical of Clockfaggotry as real Qresearch; from one former skeptic--The Qlock is for REAL!
Here is Anon's Qclock of McStain with 5:5:5 clock which inspired me the same day and bread to start clockfagging.
And next to the 5:5:5 clock is McStain's Death Clock that I decided to set to 4:28.
Any anons interested in clockfagging should ask lots of questions and be prepared for skeptical criticisms. I just hope that some of these skeptics will come around and become clockfags like I did!
WWG1WGA!