Can you conf/check the anon who is posting about playing the game, is he onto something? Should it be given more attention?
Guys let’s think about this logically. Q wouldn’t say we have so much more than we already know if it still meant we had to dig for it or wait for it to be revealed.
It’s here already, we have it. And the only thing we “have” is the breads we’ve been producing. The answers are already within the bread and I think the anon who’s digging into the related deltas is really onto something.
The future tweets proves what was right in the past.
The news unlocks the maps on how we link the “proofs” together.
I’ve always wondered all along why Q doesn’t just answer his own questions as an anon after he posts, if he doesn’t get doxxed as Q he wouldn’t get doxxed as an Anon.
I’d keep track of the posts with the anon who is cross referencing potus tweets to 4 chan posts, got a feeling they’re going to become relevant
We need to check the connection is true and that this method does indeed point us to relevant posts, I’ve noticed from the few that have appeared so far that if they were “random deltas” it would be very coincidental that they haven’t directed us to nonsense posts with the amount we have in some breads
I think that’s the hidden genius behind the deltas if they turn out to be relevant. Q points out the posts that we figure out for ourselves but those we don’t he has to have a way of steering us in that direction while still maintaining plausible deniability.
The posts that are predictive (such as the NY terror bomb) were used to validate Q. Once the validation and method for Deltas was given by Q he no longer needed to prove validation to us.
Instead the deltas became a way of validating correct information while keeping it hidden from the enemy. Once the real world action is in place we get the confirmation and then validate what we’ve been told with current news events