What is this?
This is more retard-tier misdirection. There is absolutely nothing to suggest that the post-impact broadcasts were "computer graphics." And the claim is totally nonsensical, given that there were thousands of people physically present, directly observing the smoke (and human bodies, and much else) coming out of the gaping holes in the buildings.
Serious question: How does the sun rise and set below the horizon if the earth is flat as depicted here? It would be visible from all points, merely circling overhead 24/7.
I'm not trying to suggest that there could have been any elements of illusion involved – particularly with the planes / missiles / whatever impactor was used to apply destructive force on a horizontal vector through the buildings from one side to the other.
But the physical destruction in the aftermath of the impacts was clearly evident. To suggest otherwise is pure fuckery, no doubt intended to misdirect.
*not trying to suggest that there could NOT have been
Perhaps because the incoming jet was flying very low and very fast, and everyone's attention was on the huge gaping burning hole in the first tower? Not trying to suggest there weren't many layers of fuckery, just suggesting that it's not that surprising that people in the immediate vicinity didn't see the plane until it was right there.
Yes, I tend to think flat earth (and even concave earth) are pys-ops intended to discredit and misdirect from some deeper underlying reality – most likely hollow earth.
These folks should have been executed before McCain