Anonymous ID: ba2789 Sept. 11, 2018, 9:50 a.m. No.2976263   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6348 >>6376 >>6391

>>2975796

>Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence.

The crime scene is the 'evidence'.

 

It is physically IMPOSSIBLE for a typical commercial jet with regular fuel to cause such an over-designed structure to fail. PERIOD.

 

You don't have to be a professional in the industry to know thisโ€ฆ but for what is worth it, I AM.

 

It is way crazier to believe the official story that any of the 'conspiracy theories' out there.

Anonymous ID: ba2789 Sept. 11, 2018, 10:08 a.m. No.2976512   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2976473

>>2976450

>>2976015

>>2975955

>>2975951

>>2975934

>>2975903

>>2975888

>>2975908

>>2975912

 

They told us why.

Look into the PNAC group.

 

In order to further their empire, the JEWS called for 'some catastrophic and catalyzing event โ€“ like a new Pearl Harbor.' This is in their paper titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses" (RAD) published a year before the attacks.

 

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/stockbauer1.html

 

The document is linked at the bottom of the article.

 

THIS IS THE KIND OF SHIT THAT "Q" SHOULD BE POINTING OUT