>Whats the consensus if any exists
whatever they tell you it is, don't trust it.
Clickbait & opinions vs logical thinking.
Direct communication necessary.
Trust yourself.
Think for yourself.
>"Q’s bakers, likewise, are starving for information. Their willingness to chase bread crumbs is a symptom of ignorance and powerlessness. There may be something to their belief that the machinery of the state is inaccessible to the people. It’s hard to blame them for resorting to fantasy and esotericism, after all, when accurate information about the government’s current activities is so easily concealed and so woefully incomplete. Despite Q’s insistence that “we are in control” and “you have the power,” the truth may be even more frightening."
must be getting harder writing these
avoiding the actual content of the data/crumbs at all costs
it's just as bad as ebot
SO STOKED
HIGH ENERGY!
last nite was fun. anything happenin tonite?
>More likely, according to a review by one security researcher, they are the result of random typing.
STILL USING THAT AWFULLY BAD SPIN OMG
>THIS IS THE STATE OF NEW YORK TIMES. THE JOURNALIST DOESNT KNOW HOW TO WRITE AN ARTICLE WITH RESEARCH
this is embarassing, indeed.