Please help me reconcile flight 93….

Today's ceremony with POTUS raises conflicts that need resolving. Having no plane in the big hole at the site indicates the official story is bogus….

But, the president clearly suggested victims died…and family presented a reasonable face that might support that.

So what happened:

1) It was all fake. Passed off by news as real.

-not really supported by President's behavior today. He hasn't lied about other things, just to keep a ruse going.

2) The story was true.

-maybe this was the only plane that was REALLY hijacked in order to complete the illusion for the other ones which were guided.

-maybe the victims really forced the plane down.

-but where is the wreckage? why the inconsitencies?

3) another explanation: perhaps it was shot down, and those aboard really died in a defensive action….

-this would suggest the plane was controlled, like the others and there was no other way to stop it

-this would explain why the wreckage was missing and/or the debris was strewn across such a wide area.

-this would explain why it would take so long for the victim highlighted by POTUS to get her husband's ring back.

(but what about the bogus "Let's roll" guy?)

I'm leaning toward 3.

What are your thoughts? Tell me where I'm wrong…