Anonymous ID: 64cf4a Sept. 11, 2018, 1:36 p.m. No.2979125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9155

>>2979030

interdasting… so what was your methodology?

had your post ready, waited by trump's twatter for a tweet, then smashed that New Reply button as fast as you could?

Anonymous ID: 64cf4a Sept. 11, 2018, 1:42 p.m. No.2979222   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9337

>>2979155

what programs do you use?

notifications for tweets?

impressed by the 6 seconds… i have notifs but by the time i get to twitter there's always already lots of responses and retweets, it seems to be lagging

Anonymous ID: 64cf4a Sept. 11, 2018, 1:53 p.m. No.2979378   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9426

>>2979344

>maybe she thinks we forget her anti-clockfag shilling of yore?

exactly what i was thinking…

when i think back at how long and how ferociously gingerfagger fought the clockfags… not one of us.

at least not one to be trusted.

Anonymous ID: 64cf4a Sept. 11, 2018, 1:57 p.m. No.2979419   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9454

>>2979337

>I had to use qmap.pub to get the timing in seconds

?

ah ok, to have the seconds for the tweet, got it.

 

welp, couldn't disprove you even if i wanted to.

very interesting experiment, thanks.

 

could be a fresh coat of plausible deniability paint, maybe…

Anonymous ID: 64cf4a Sept. 11, 2018, 1:59 p.m. No.2979467   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2979426

>definitely an odd one

indeed… could be "organic"… or it's a wolf in sheep's clothing, false-fren anon building cred with worthy posts and then leading down wrong paths (or fighting against proper ones)