Anonymous ID: f56535 Feb. 7, 2018, 4:43 p.m. No.298320   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8384 >>8823

I’ve gtg for the night anons, please keep digging into the deltas to either prove/disprove the theory that they’re linked, it could turn out to be the key to us unlocking the news and redpilling much more effectively.

 

We know Q is reading, and while I understand he probably can not confirm that this theory is correct, however if he could negate the theory by saying it is merely coincidental it would save anons a lot of digging time that could be better used elsewhere.

 

Theory is:

Tweets indicate a delta -Delta points back to post at specific time.

 

“Future (tweets) prove past (posts)”

 

All posts linked so far have not been trash but have been information or links that appear “random” to the thread - normally disregarded however could be strategically placed to be “delta indicated” too later.

Anonymous ID: f56535 Feb. 7, 2018, 4:50 p.m. No.298435   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8469

>>298384

 

It allows plausible deniability while steering us in the right direction providing the theory is correct. Given the amount of shitposts in these threads at times can we class it as more than merely coincidental that all posts linked so far have been informative?