>>2985818
>What are we supposed to do???? Lie about it?!
We're supposed to pretend it's not there, we don't see it and for fuck's sake, not mention it!!
But is that really honest research? Ignoring a glaring consistency? Not to say others aren't involved but one thing seems to be constant, so... just pretend it isn't there to appease others. I don't think that's honest, just like it's not honest to ignore that there are gentiles involved and even sometimes put in the public-face front.
>>2985818
that's what I mean by "once you know"
What I notice here lately, is that there is a dedicated team who white knights every thread for one group - but does anyone have a devoted 24x7 team to white knight for Muslims? Philipinos? Communists? Catholics? Jesuits? Freemasons? Mexicans?
Is there a program in place, funded in one case by a government, to have people scour the 'net and pop up to defend them whenever anyone "notices"?
No one ever chimes in with abject desperation to defend Stalin here (fakebot doesn't count).