>>2986719

There are several shills posting this shit and the replies to it.

They are good at making it sound like calm reasoned statements.

However, there are no verified facts.

No sources

And we are just asked to believe

That a jet fuel fire can do certain things

Without any numbers that we could check

Can jet fuel heat up to 1100 degrees?

Does structural steel really lose half its strength at that temperature?

How much fuel was actually present?

Why would we expect a liquid fuel to concentrate the fire against central columns?

This is just full of shillery and should be totally ignored.

Numerous engineers have studied the issues

And have published detailed technical articles

Complete with numbers and calculations.

>>2986802

If there was any truth in what you say

You would be able to refer to a website

With a detailed engineering description

And even engineering descriptions

Are subject to the laws of rhetoric

And must be able to withstand educated criticism

Before we can seriously consider them.

>>2986837

I remember when they advertised by USPS mail

And you would get envelopes saying something like

You TOO may be a wiener!

Those were the days, MAD old days they were too.