>>2986544 (pb)

Firing squad. It's so fucking American. It's abrupt, shocking, and bloody, but ultimately very humane since the intense drop in blood pressure caused by taking 2-3 .30-06 rounds in the heart rapidly exsanguinates the brain and causes unconsciousness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_by_firing_squad

The way the condemned hits the ground like a bag of rocks is super satisfying. I dunno, I find hanging to be insufficiently barbaric (even if it's done "incorrectly"), and the guillotine is disgusting. Beheading is disgusting. No matter what the person did, mutilating their corpse like that is not what we should try to become. A person that faces a firing squad can still be buried properly.

Judging sin is God's job. Ours is only to arrange the meeting. We bury our dead, we don't chop them up and play with the pieces like arabs.

>>2986659

The twin towers got nearly all of their supporting strength from a core of steel columns surrounding the elevator complex. Since we know that, while burning kerosene CANNOT melt structure steel, it can heat it up. At 1100º, the strength of structural steel is reduced by about half. Past that, it rapidly loses more of its strength as it shifts from a rigid crystalline structure to a more plastic structure.

Don't get me wrong, the twin towers and building 7 were most likely destroyed with help from commercial demolition products, but a building as tall and heavy as those towers COULD collapse just from a massive jet fuel fire against the central column.

What it could NOT do is freefall into its own footprint the way it did.

>>2986738

I mean, one of the videos of WTC 7's freefall shows windows popping outward on numerous floors on the same X coordinate well before the freefall has begun. That's what happens when you use demo cord to simultaneously initiate shaped charges and shear all the columns at once so the building can freefall.

If you don't do it this way, the steel will not "shear" and you will get a very messy collapse instead of a proper freefall demolition. In fact, in some botched demolitions, the building doesn't even fall over despite that a large percentage of its steel superstructure has been shattered by 70,000mph directed explosions. This necessitates a costly manual demolition lasting months, since it's not safe to go back inside and place charges to attempt the demolition again.

There is no doubt in my mind that those buildings were demolished. If they weren't, the towers would have fallen over sideways and destroyed several city blocks each.

>>2986772

That part bothers me, too. Commercial aircraft are made of a very thin aluminum skins over an alumnium and\or titanium airframe designed to get as much strength as possible out of the least mass, to improve the ratio of strength to fuel economy.

You can visit a forming company such as Quality Forming, Inc. in Torrance, CA who makes a lot of Boeing's complex sheet metal parts:

http://www.cadenceaerospace.com/products/aeros/centers_of_excellence/qfi_operations.html

The outer airframe is only a few millimeters thick. Aircraft like that will crumple up like a paper cup if they strike solid objects. The thought of an inter-connected web of structural steel support beams being cut through by a commercial airliner just doesn't jibe with my experience handling these parts in real life. It would be like throwing a boiled egg at chicken wire and expecting the wire to lose in the collision…

Add to this: no one has ever produced a photo or video of a single piece of aircraft wreckage on the Pentagon lawn or visible in the damaged structure, or in the field in Pennsylvania where the 4th plane crashed. Also, with the Pentagon strike, the damaged area of the building is too narrow for it to have been hit by a commercial airliner. The wings are basically huge aluminum balloons full of fuel and avionic hardware. It is totally inconceivable that a plane could hit that building and not damage it out to nearly the full width of the aircraft's wingspan.

>>2986770

I keep seeing that image but I can't tell what it is.

>>2986778

I might.

>>2986803

Well, yes. There's the one video of the main spire of the tower, which is still standing 10+ seconds after the freefall, suddenly collapsing and disintegrating into dust as it falls.

Understand me, anons: THIS. CAN. NOT. HAPPEN. There is no known force in physics that can cause a massive steel spire to vaporize into dust while it is falling, such that it never even hits the ground!

The only explanations for that particular occurrence are:

A) The video was doctored. This isn't extremely plausible, because why and how would they edit the video to make it look like something totally impossible happened? Plus, that huge spire, again, would have fallen over sideways and smashed the shit out of New York but it didn't. It never hit the ground.

B) Someone employed little-understood high-energy or high-voltage physics effects to rip the molecules apart, turning the steel into fine powder. If you study the Philadelphia Experiment aboard the USS Eldridge or the Hutchison effect, you may begin to understand how Tesla-type technology may make this possible: at certain extremely high frequencies and energy levels, electromagnetic fields may in fact be able to excite metals to the point where they would rather do ANYTHING ELSE besides stick to each other.

I cannot fathom a better explanation for how that enormous fucking spire disappeared before my eyes. When it was falling, I thought I was about to witness an unbelievably destructive collateral damage event, but that never happened.

>>2986805

Go ahead and ignore where I said I agree it was demolished and call me a shill despite my consistently explaining my reasoning and never supporting the globalist conclusion.

Here's an experiment you can do. Take a butter knife. See if you can bend it. Now let it sit on a stove burner for 5 minutes until it's glowing red. Try to bend it again (use vice grips, you idiot). It becomes easier to bend. Please, if you can't understand that heating metals increases their plasticity and decreases their strength, do not claim to be technically-minded. Please, if you can't understand that the building contained many different fuel sources besides the jet fuel, do not claim to be technically-minded. Please, if you feel the need to call someone a shill to attack their argument, go back to 4-pol where you'll be in good company.

>>2986823

Well, you don't usually use demo cord to break the beams. It has a very high propagation velocity but a lot of that energy would come outward. Usually you'd use normal electric detonators on plastique-type explosives placed inside thick angled metal brackets which will "shape" the explosion into a penetrating blast which is good for cutting (shearing) steel. Demo cord is useful for rapidly destroying non-steel things, like masonry and wood, which might be encasing the steel columns.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_oH74R2bGI

Watch how this little linear charge with a metal block behind it neatly shears this steel plate:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cPhjWOdqUI

>>2986867

>but it is also about breaking up the building into manageable sections for recovery.

Yes, that's a good point. You don't want the superstructure in gigantic, unwieldy pieces such that you spend a month with torches cutting them up.

I had not thought about the part you mention with the lower structure being unable to deflect the plummeting mass to the sides, and there was indeed a huge basement 7 stories deep for the rubble to collapse into. But it still boggles my mind how neatly that thing collapsed in on itself. I can't fathom that not having been assisted via demo.

>>2986878

Even if the fuselage could have staked into the ground, completely crumpled and dug into the dirt, it would have thrown a shitload of debris out sideways as it crumpled, and your idea doesn't adequately account for the wings, which would have come off sideways from the fuselage no matter the situation. A disproportionate amount of the aircraft's mass (fuel, wing skeleton, etc) is in the wings. I just can't believe that absolutely no aircraft debris would be visible, even though planes do crumple up into confetti when they crash.

>>2986918

Haven't seen that movie, I am not a big fan of Hollyweird. I want to see these, but I can't stand supporting them, and I don't know how to torrent movies.

>>2986992

Yeah. Botched demolition is fucking messy and all kinds of things can happen. If the physics plays out right, you can even have pieces break off and go flying a quarter mile away. The amount of energy involved is staggering, and if some tiny little piece ends up bearing unimaginable amounts of weight for a split second it can fragment and "burst" apart and hurt a lot of people.

>>2987027

I kek'd a bit too hard at that one. They really do think we're that stupid.

>>2987055

My cheating is I (still) have a Netflix subscription. :(

They have a lot of shows that aren't leftist propaganda filth that I've enjoyed and for the price it ends up being a good value if I watch 3 or 4 things a month.

>>2987059

I call it neatly in comparison to what would happen if they detonated an atomic bomb in the lobby.

>>2987062

I have never heard that theory but I can dig it. If you know the resonant frequencies for materials and have the hardware and energy to invest, you can destroy almost anything using sound waves.

It's kind of like pushing a kid on a swing set. The period of the kid's motion (swinging) is a few seconds. You apply more energy only at a specific point, the apogee of his rear swing, and the result is that you maintain the swinging motion.

The resonant frequency of materials, like glass, is similar. You apply energy at a specific frequency such that the overall kinetic energy of the material is constantly increased until it breaks.

>>2987063

>>2987075

I'm pretty sure Bill Mitchell is a friendly, though. And not Mossad.

>>2987138

It's time for you to suck-start a '57 Chevy.

>>2987139

Detonation cord should not be thought of as an explosive.

It is a thin plastic tube that has PETN dust on the inside of it. Think of it as an extremely, extremely, extremely high-speed fuse (It "burns" at 14317 miles per hour) which is powerful enough to set off high explosives without the use of a primer\detonator.

It does not really have enough power to destroy steel structure on its own, and would not really ever be used that way.

>>2987159

Yes, thank you for posting them and I'm glad to help. Pls steal!

Faggots like Microchip AKA Graham Milton clearly have some concealed motivation–duress, bribery, or complicity–for attacking Q. Otherwise, attacking Q is a complete waste of energy and misuse of resources for anyone who claims to be a patriot.

>>2987160

>Just listen to the YT link I posted.

>An hour and change video of people yammering at each other

Sorry, I can't do it. I can't even handle the George Webb style 15-20 minute ones. This format is just completely unpalatable.

About videos like these, my feeling is "If you need more than 5 minutes to make your point, you probably don't have a very good one." Feel free to summarize for me, but saying "Here, just watch this 80 minute video and it will all be clear!" plants the following face on my grill:

>>2987162

I have to admit that I don't know much about either YourVoice or Thomas Drake, so I have no opinion.

>>2987170

I have uTorrent and I know how to use it, but all my favorite torrent sites are long gone. I used to use nyaa.eu, demonoid.com, and a few others that disappeared into the void. No idea what to use anymore.

>>2987284

My opinion of TPB is that it's too popular for it to possibly be safe to use, so I've never used it. I don't even actually know the URL.

>>2987295

Exactly! Demolishing huge buildings is costly, technical, difficult work requiring a lot of planning, and they STILL sometimes completely fail!

If you could successfully demolish buildings like these by setting them on fire, there would be no such thing as a demolition company!

>>2987300

In other words:

"I'm a simple man, but I know a false flag when I see one."

>>2987327

Oh, man. This has been a great 9\11 bread but these shenanigans with the would-be baker are too much!

>>2987343

Viktor Orban is a fucking champion!

The first world leader to endorse GEOTUS!