Anonymous ID: 27c342 Sept. 12, 2018, 12:31 a.m. No.2987441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7482 >>7909 >>7917

(Bread #3779)

>>2987225

>>2987240

>...I bet someone skimped on building costs and pocketed the difference....

>>2987247

>...Symmetrical failure is impossible with assymetrical loading.

 

There was an asbestos cleanup issue hanging over the buildings, an enormous project. Easier to tear them down. Now some of the damning history of the original plans are knocking on my unconscious, but I don't want to get sucked into the vortex.

 

The building were mostly empty, no office furniture, that whole thing of the contents turning to dust was misdirection, there might have even been multiple levels that didnit have floors installed. They were built to be taken down, anyway, Satanic ritual.

Anonymous ID: 27c342 Sept. 12, 2018, 1:13 a.m. No.2987657   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7764

>>2987482

What I'm remembering is something about siting the buildings, going back to the beginning of the last century. There was something about the buildings being framed in the arch of Washington Square Park. I think people were kicked out, the usual. Robert Moses must be in the mix somewhere. Must resist going down rabbithole.

 

This is taking me on other tangents. I'll bet that movie "The Walk" has embedded predictive programming. A propos of nothing, it looks totally weird to me seeing images of lower Manhattan built all the way to the edge of the island, waiting for a giant tsunami to come knock it all over. Some huge percentage of the world's population lives along coastlines. Canary Island to the left of me, Hawaii slump to the right.

Anonymous ID: 27c342 Sept. 12, 2018, 1:31 a.m. No.2987742   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2987732

And Rummy just happened to be on the "other" side of the Pentagon. Trusting soul, him, you couldn't get me to let someone shoot that apple on my head.