Anonymous ID: b1e124 Sept. 12, 2018, 6:46 a.m. No.2989127   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9157 >>9198

>>2989098 thank u for your work anon

 

I found a character who was a source to Mark and Luke in the Bible who is unknown, referred to by "Q". A double entendre maybe? Q does use a lot of scripture

 

"The general assumption among source critics is that Mark was the first written gospel. This is seen by an analysis of Matthew and Luke — both Matthew and Luke have material in their gospels that is common to the gospel of Mark. At the same time, there is common material found in Luke and in Matthew that is not found in Mark. The scholars then try to account for this common information found in these two gospels that is absent from Mark's gospel. The working hypothesis is that Matthew and Luke, in addition to having Mark as a source for their information, had a second independent source that Mark did not use. This second independent source is called simply the 'Q-source.'

 

That letter Q is used since it is the first letter of the German word quelle, which is simply the word for source. That is to say, the Q-source is a source that is unknown to us but known to the gospel writers Matthew and Luke."

 

https://www.christianity.com/jesus/is-jesus-god/the-gospels/what-is-the-q-source.html

 

https://bible.org/seriespage/what-q-gospel-gospel-according-st-q

Anonymous ID: b1e124 Sept. 12, 2018, 6:50 a.m. No.2989157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9175

>>2989127

 

wait a minute the juice here would be "That letter Q is used since it is the first letter of the German word quelle, which is simply the word for source". This is a hypothetical idea, not in scripture. But Quelle is the word for source, that's interdasting