i've always said that the first amendment needs to be used responsibly.
it's like, umnh, you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
there has to be free speech, but there has to be standards as well.
This is similar to the reasoning why we shouldn't have full disclosure on nonames crimes.
>Anyone who unironically announces to the board that they're filtering is probably a high school-aged girl.
I'm filtering you just to give it a shot. Hope I'm not using too much irony.
your didn't read the word "irony?"
you missed the point of my post.
do you laugh much. if you don't know what time of day it is, or even if it is night or day, it might be time to take a break.
I almost believe that. But for me it includes too much of a high-ranking madman screaming: "You can't handle the truth."
I get that Q is choosing method one of redpilling.
If we really believe in democracy and our fellow citizens (scary) then ultimately we don't get to choose if the truth is accepted, or it is forced into the open. We must stand behind the idea that it must come out.
if we are afraid to face the consequences of truth, then we are choosing to live a lie out of preference for comfort.
can you see me?
shut'em down!
I've been saying for years
Shut'em down!
Nuclear enerygy is responsbile for 33% of global warming
damn, I wanted to see if I turned into a high-school girl.
anything can be any amount responsible for something imaginary
it's like the sexy lady mathematician who said to the misbehaving anon:
"you won't get any if you keep behaving like that."
anon cleaned up his act.
still did not get any, but got a soft chuckle at the way logic is not always intuitive.
it's like krypton to Magneto