>blindly parrots extremely unlikely muh jews narrative where one group is coincidentally completely beyond any and all logical criticism and requires vicious defense to signal your virtue
>other people are the dum ones
Use logic anons
Being on a chan, in a movement that specifically began on /pol/, who would be the divisionfags?
A. anons repeating what has been said on /pol/ on a constant and daily basis for years now
B. anons tripping over themselves to irrationally defend jews and attack any anon who states really basic baby's first red pill tier information
Shills understand that there are many anons fully red-pilled on the JQ, and many normies, lurkers, and newfags who are not.
They likely come and post on BOTH SIDES of the debate, using strawman arguments that are deliciously tempting for the other side to attack.
In other words, they post long rambling incoherent anti-jew posts with not much value in order to draw out the "love muh joos" crowd.
And they post blanket denials and overtly blue-pilled pro-jew posts to draw out the typical /pol/ anon crowd.
This not only creates arguments surrounding their posts, but just stirs the pot in general and real anons will begin arguing with each other.
They can take issues like this and manipulate them to their advantage, regardless of who is right.
Filter me too, I don't want my words read by an insufferable faggot who is willing to blind themselves to potential information because they'd rather not risk the hysterical emotional trauma of reading scary words if they don't move their eyes past it fast enough.
They sure do love the jews, though.
It's a lot more likely that's it's an actual coincidence that subsequently motivated someone to use it for a meme, and motivated Q to post it.
Sounds like you've made yourself completely worthless to the board, good job.
I'm happy for your feelings, though, congrats.