>How do you inflict MAX PAIN / DAMAGE?
>Drop [daily] carpet bombs [RATS RUNNING] >>> drop/release MOAB?
Is it better to threaten the FISA drop every day to make them panic and further incriminate themselves or just drop it?
>https://saraacarter.com/how-anti-trump-leakers-moved-from-offense-to-defense/
Summarizes the Deep State playbook: Leak to make opponents look bad, then obstruct to ensure your leaks never get revealed.
SESSIONS and FLYNN [targeted] for [immediate] removal/recusal?
>As soon as Sessions (Lifelong Republican, 'Silent Executioner', National Security Adviser to Trump Campaign) was appointed, he was targeted to be removed from the Russia Investigation due to his meeting with Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak
>Flynn was targeted for meeting up with the Russian ambassador to the United States in December 2016, before the President-Elect took office.
>Sessions was recused (3/2/2017) and Flynn had resigned (2/13/2017) before the [RR] letter to Trump asking Trump to fire Comey (5/8/2017) and the opening of the Mueller/Special Counsel investigation (5/17/2017).
SESSIONS Senate CONF vote?
>53 to 47 if I recall correctly
[RR] Senate CONF vote?
>94-6
Reconcile.
>Rod got the support of both parties, R's because he was Trump's pick and D's because he would be complicit in helping them.
>Sessions got only support from R's, was heavily protested by D's.
>RR's Nay votes were:
>Blumenthal (D-CT)
>Booker (D-NJ)
>Cortez Masto (D-NV)
>Gillibrand (D-NY)
>Harris (D-CA)
>Warren (D-MA)
IF SESSIONS WASN'T A THREAT WHY WAS HE THE PRIMARY TARGET?
WHY WAS IT CRITICAL TO MOVE [RR] INTO DOJ ACTING AG RE: APPOINTMENT OF MUELLER / DIR SC OVERSIGHT [AUTH]?
>Because they knew, with unrestricted power, Sessions would have no problem taking them down. They had to put Rod in charge of all things Russia, because he would cover for them.
>Rod was a direct player in signing the FISA warrants on Carter Page and by extension the Trump Campaign and therefore was forced to play cover up for everything Russia-related to save his own ass.
IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR ENEMY IS PLANNING HOW DO YOU PREPARE STRATEGICALLY?
>You slap oversight onto them (Horowitz appointed to oversee 2 months into Special Counsel Investigation).
>You make your key players look like they're on the side of your enemy so it doesn't look Partisan when the happening happens.
THINK TODAY.
LEFT SUPPORTING SESSIONS?
LEFT DEFENDING SESSIONS?
>Yes, for the past 2 years Trump has publicly berated Sessions for not doing anything/recusing himself from the biggest investigation of the past 2 years.
>They have also clashed over policy for example, Marijuana.
>Now the Left sees Sessions as someone who doesn't do Trump's bidding and defends him and his inaction.
STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE?
>There is absolutely an advantage in putting Sessions on the side of the Left, it makes any decisions he makes seem more fair, not Partisan, NOT ORDERED BY TRUMP.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/12/new-strzok-page-texts-reveal-others-were-leaking-like-mad-in-lead-up-to-trump-russia-probe.html
>Article about how more information is coming out proving the DoJ's set up of the Trump Administration.
https://twitter.com/FoxBusiness/status/1039907275274678273
>Jim Jordan "They were leaking stories to the Press to write stories favorable to what they were trying to accomplish"
https://twitter.com/AmericaNewsroom/status/1039872139694878722
>Jim Jordan "Inspector General said 13 people were leaking to one reporter"
With PANIC comes MISTAKES.
With PANIC comes BETRAYAL.
With PANIC comes TESTIMONY.
>As the threat of the FISA-bomb looms, people make mistakes, say things that were supposed to be kept quiet, they betray each other for better immunity deals and lighter pressure from the Justice Department.
With PANIC comes ………….
>Unsure, Anons help?
These people are STUPID.
FISA GOES BOTH WAYS.
>The FISA application incriminates the signers/collaborators as much as it gave access to Carter Page and the Trump Campaign. ? Any other information for this one?
+
>Unsure, Anons help?
HOOAH!
Q