>>2995326 (Last bread)
Can you point me to the posts where Q has confirmed all of this?
Or is this your own summary conclusion.
If it's your own conclusion, can you post the materials that support your conclusions?
Thanks.
Call me a skeptic, but I don't usually believe anonymous posters on line without any source material to support salacious accusations like this.
Thank you Baker.
>Military planning at its finest.
Kek.
You're not part of any military … except maybe Iraq's.
>So if Q the anonymous poster, posted it you'd believe???
No.
But it wasn't Q's post that I was responding to, fucktard.
It was another anons.
But if that anon was using Q's drops as his proof, I would have asked the obvious follow up: where did Q get his information?
Fuck off back to whatever dick you were sucking on.
Nobody was talking to you.
There sure are a lot of half naked women on this board.
Can the moderators please delete those naked lady pictures?
Their are probably a lot of under 18 folks on here and we aren't dirty-minded like the democrats.
Thank you mods.
>why would they ban (((the_zionald)))? that shit's been comp'd since day 1.
Q has hinted at this as well.
And this is why I know this Q idiot is not close to Trump in any way.
>Hope Q is right about midterms being safe.
Do NOT listen to Q!
Mid terms are NOT safe … and Q is irresponsible for telling you that!
Get the fuck out and VOTE!
BTW, this is Q's biggest tell as to his real reason for running this psyop.
Anyone with two brain cells can see the problem with a supposed "Trump insider" telling his base that "mid terms are safe."
Wake up, anons!