>he didnt have an argument against any point that was meticulously presented in the post,
>meticulously
You actually think your loose-brained words were meticulous? A jumbled heap of words is not an argument any more than a jumbled heap of bricks could be considered a house.
The guy posting evidence that makes Jews look bad, dd1feb, is indeed acting contrary to what Q's call for unity. That doesn't mean dd1feb 's evidence is false. It also doesn't make your arguments logical.
It is possible that dd1feb is posting the truth about the dancing Israelis only because someone (e.g. a pizza merchant) is paying him to do so. That does not convince me that we can make a logical leap and assume that dd1feb is getting paid by Shareblue or Brock Matzoh or anyone else. It is entirely possible that dd1feb simply does not respect Q's desire for unity.
However, for the sake of argument, let us assume that everyone else on the board aside from dd1feb does respect Q's request for unity. Even Q has mentioned that Mossad does evil things and Israel will eventually be punished. Maybe you can be pro-Q and pro-Jew; I imagine Trump himself is pro-Q and pro-Jew. But I don't believe you can be pro-Q and pro-Israel.
"the problem is not jews per-se, it is unchecked jewish supremacism and subversion.”
Perhaps, in some happy future, President Trump will declassify enough docs so that even the normies will see that the modern world has been dominated by psychopaths and their conspiracies. Psychopaths of any ethnic background are dangerous. But some psychopaths are Jewish, and even if non-Jews love every non-psychopathic Jew, non-Jews must reserve the right to take action against Jewish psychopaths.