Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 10:19 p.m. No.3030031   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0092 >>0141 >>0210

TY Baker!!!

 

>>3029793 (lb)

>>3029874 (lb)

>>3029818 (lb)

 

There are only 12 tribes. The 144k doesn't come from some arbitrary interpretation. The 12x12k are canonical as per the 144k in Revelation. Identifying them is the most crucial part.

 

The fact you guys are pushing a 13th is blatantly criminalizing. Just reveal yourselves outright. Stop hiding. Come out and face us with all your might. Prove to everyone, here, that you have a claim to the glory of God. Do it.

 

>>3029874 (lb)

This.

Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 10:56 p.m. No.3030313   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0323 >>0358 >>0378 >>0384

>>3030247

Where's the strawman? Point it out for the world to see, shill.

 

>>3030269

>You don't need to claim you're inferior you weak minded yid to not be supremacist.

That's not what I said, is it? Your reading comprehension skills are lacking. Anons see what you are doing, and are figuring out your patterns now. Use the arguments as points of dispute, without any reconciliation to the original argument. Keep digging, though. This is actually fun. I'm literally defeating you with with Rum, redheads, and simple logic.

 

This shit is fun. It's like the old days when you guys would rage-quit in Counterstrike. Have another rare because I'm feeling frothy tonight.

Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 11:08 p.m. No.3030401   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0449

>>3030358

>You don't need to claim you're inferior to not be supremacist.

>You need to claim you're inferior to NOT be supremacist.

See how that works? I'm serious; you guys really suck at this, and I'm half fucking lit by now. My 4th grader has more logic than you do.

Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 11:19 p.m. No.3030479   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0533 >>0549

>>3030449

It's simple. If you have an ideology, then you believe it is superior. If you adhere to no ideology, then you believe that the lack of ideology is "the way" or "Tao". In other words, superior. You CANNOT argue against this. If you do, then you claim superiority to the ideology of ideologies.

 

You should seriously consider contemplating this over some Nigiri and Sake. That paycheck you're getting isn't really worth it.

Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 11:36 p.m. No.3030579   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0635

>>3030533

>RIGHT one, not the SUPERIOR one.

adjective

adjective: right; comparative adjective: righter; superlative adjective: rightest

 

1.

morally good, justified, or acceptable.

"I hope we're doing the right thing"

synonyms: just, fair, proper, good, upright, righteous, virtuous, moral, ethical, honorable, honest; More

lawful, legal

"it wouldn't be right to do that"

antonyms: wrong, unjust

2.

true or correct as a fact.

Welp, looks like that one is settled. You fail at Engrish.

 

> I don't see Buddhism as a supremacist ideology either, because it does not tell Buddhists that they are superior to others just because they are Buddhists.

 

Buddhists disagree:

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/25/asia/myanmar-buddhist-nationalism-mabatha/index.html

 

>I just did :)

No, you didn't.

 

> pilpul is a desperate attempt to keep judaism from being banned from the West,

I've not mentioned this one. You have.

 

>Shalom little yid :)

Ad hominem. You've lost; repeatedly. Look, you did an alright job, but you still suck at this.

Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 11:39 p.m. No.3030598   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0629 >>0652

>>3030549

>Well, if it works for you to have it be "the way" instead of "a way", then be my guest.

You are not an authority on this, it seems:

the absolute principle underlying the universe, combining within itself the principles of yin and yang and signifying the way

 

Again, nice try, and you guys really do suck at this.

Anonymous ID: 321744 Sept. 14, 2018, 11:53 p.m. No.3030675   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3030629

> You donโ€™t determine whoโ€™s an authority on something you donโ€™t understand.

How presumptuous. Again, superiority permeates your statements.

 

>>3030652

>The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao; The name that can be named is not the eternal name.

So you are the authority? What's the winning lottery numbers next week, oh enlightened one?