in regards to hal turner notable heres waht ya said baker
>>3033735
then heres what more anons thought of it
>>3033731
>>3033860
>>3033703
>>3033709
>>3033710
>>3033713
ofc make your own editorial decision, but i figured id aggregate anons responses for you to see
ALL (PB) SORRY
you need a proper reason to not include Hal Turner?
Heres two
1) that article is nothing but speculation and no sauce, and adds no additional info
2) hal turner is a former FBI spook that makes shit up worse than true pundit
was trying to be cool but you're being a dick about your own poor decision making
well no wonder you're shilling for hal turner, like a fucking idiot you gave him your money.
Hopefully baker sees this and realizes what you're doing
yeah I read the article and its shit with nothing of value. just the because you were so fucking dumb to give him money doesnt mean it was worth it or its valuable in anyway.
you're giving it intrinsic value because you parted with your dollars, normal human emotion. put your emotions aside and judge the information for actual value. there is none. and anons have read, evaluated, and spoken up on this issue, you stupid emotional dumb shit faggot
the burden of proof is with the one making the claim you idiot. hes just making shit up and puking it out to morons like you willing to buy it. where is the proof of any of the claims in the article? Oh wait. there is none. again
Set your emotions aside and try to judge rationally. you seem to have a problem with this.
yeah… i've made you expose yourself enough for anons to see. thanks halturnershillanon
the burden of proof is on hal turner to support his claims, funny how that went right over your head.
that happens when you're so emotional you type out walls of red text every post