>>3036174

next DS attack is: look at the view count on voat, movement is dying.

The numbers were rigged on previous site, do we really believe these numbers?

>>3036755

Then we are left with only one option: voat is a honeypot.

What do we know about the adm? Didnt the site once go down for like a week without admin bringing it up? Strange.

At least it doesnt have polls, the most manipulative thing in the history of things.

>>3036822

Isnt this here a problem? Didnt some voat's pg researchers go missing? I mean, it could very well be the investigation that got them but it is definitely weird when more than a few people have the same link.

>>3036914

Am I not allowed to question? Before Q told us about paytriots, was it allowed to question JC?

>>3036952

Misunderstand, I was talking about voat and assumed you were also talking about it since my first sentence in the original comment >>3036914 talks about voat.