>>236

https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#236

So, let’s get this straight… “‘They’ want you divided,” but Q wants you together so Q and anons dividing via actions, comments or lack thereof is not really dividing and, thus, should not be considered, but instead should be ignored or overlooked as a necessary, part of the plan, required disinformation or some other miscellaneous, unexplainable excuse/reason that should not be questioned or thought about logically (because it is Q and the plan).

Thus, the rules so far…

Think logically and question everything….but not Q or the plan.

Think logically unless it contradicts Q and/or the plan, in which case don’t think logically, don’t think (at all) or question, just accept as stated because it is Q and at the same time attack others as sheep who blindly follow a plan or direction without question.

Offer logic, digging, questioning, etc….unless those results or questions contradict Q or the plan, in which case ignore those results and pretend they don’t exist.

When one submits actual logic or evidence of standard fallacies…the rest of the borg collective Anons (hive mind) should make sure that one receives one or more of the following responses (that coincidentally contradict Q directives but is a fact that should not be noticed or noted by borg, collective, hive mind anons blindly following Q, all who should reply with one of these acceptable responses)…STFU, GTFO, Why are you here? Shill. Clown, not patriot….etcetera, etcetera….

The hypocrisy and mutually exclusive contradictions here are amazing.

>>3038866

So you are trying to suggest that I am imagining all of that, but written in such a way that makes you sound smarter than you are because you didn’t and/or couldn’t produce any real, legitimate, valid evidence to the contrary. Got it.

So you are suggesting that none of those items specified really happened?

>>3038912

Ha. Perfect! Exactly! Thank you for providing the real-time proof and “human element” proof of my point! Great job, sir!

>>3038866 Please see the newly posted, and clearly verified evidence that you seem to miss! 😂

>>3038866

>>3038899

>>3038912

Way, way…too, too funny! The replies to my post indeed provided the exact proof of the claims I stated!

Wake up!

Up your game!

Learn more!

Thank God Almighty that the bad guys, cabal, cult, left, rinos, etc., are as stupid as they are or they would have a much easier battle on their hands.

The sad excuses for logic, reasoning and critical thinking skills as displayed on this board are less than poor.

The education system cheated the youth and middle aged.

>>3039122

No, not “a black man,” Obama, Clinton, McCain, Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer,Durbin, McConnell, Ryan…..etc., etc.,…..

>>3039138

Great. Another logic expert who apparently believes that others cannot read or respond to childhood tactics, a picture with words….a bumper sticker.

Reading, it’s fundamental.

Try it! Learn!

>>3039194

Certainly you seem to be suggesting that you have a point, but you have not clearly stated it in words. Writing skills are a sign of good communication and education. Try it.

If you have any evidence to refute my initial points above, please state them clearly by using proper grammar and logic.

>>3039234

>>3039234

WOW, dude! Thanks! You alone checked off several of the points made in my op above, and demonstrated even further the lack of logic, reasoning, critical thinking skills and lack of understanding of Fallacies (non-logic) used by idiots who do not have any thinking or debate skills!

Super genius props to you!

To the super genius anons trying to respond to my posts…props for trying, but stop. Instead of showing and proving your lack of understanding…go DUCKDUCKGO……and read!

Learn moar!