>>3039342

> Major activity. 15 minutes straight of "booms"…..NOT fireworks.

intradesting… anything more you can tell us?

>>3039422

thanks! be safe.

<What you SEE is 2%.

<The WAR is REAL.

>>3039443

just need

([])=,e

• regex, but since that doesn't take care of the replies to it, i prefer doing it manually w FilterID+.

had no filter phases, but lately newbreads a lot of serial post-fillers get it

>>3039480

yup, that's why filterID+, it removes the replies but not eventual other posts from anons that took that bait.

useful for lame bait posts and trolls

>>3039508

didn't code it myself, but yes, using

([])=,e

and the regex function should wipe out all variations, you just have to do it once.

but as pointed out in other posts, you get the replies to it, which quickly grows annoying.

>>3039514

>>3039597

see

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f71ada No.2773384 📁Aug 28 2018 18:18:29 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 9fae1c No.2773150 📁 Aug 28 2018 18:10:24 (EST)

>>2773040

Q SO WHATS UP WITH ASSANGE ???

>>2773150

Do you remember that our enemies are also monitoring this board?

See above, reflect, use logic.

Q

>>3039641

>>3039670

no prob. notice the good example of the value of

re-reading crumbs

ok, a liddle other something for our newfrens:

the stupid, the shills, the chaos?

yesyes, it gets annoying and draining, we know, we're in it too.

but think of it as a moat. a defensive layer of gunk, gushing streams of the most wretched hive of scum and villany, in which weak souls are engulfed and crushed.

it's not for the faint. that's why you've been warned about this place, among other reasons.

tl;dr : chaos is not just a ladder, tis a moat, too

>>3039830

that's still funny and so perfect i wonder if it wasn't shopped, at first… glawrious

>>3040031

>SHRED

not shreds, crumbs.

https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub//

currently at 2176

have at it

(yeahyeah shouldn't bite, i know)

>>3040068

Ain't nothing wrong with em, but the Citybillies often don't like em. Funny part is they just as often don't know they're Citybillies

>>3040125

seems "journalists" would rather asked some uninformed anonymous sources and youtubers