Anonymous ID: a45111 Sept. 15, 2018, 7:28 p.m. No.3040301   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0387 >>0457 >>0475 >>0557 >>0576 >>0861

>>3040192

Here is a problem I see fellow anons. If you read further than Sec 1.7 you will get to the declassification portion of this EO. Therein lies the dilemma, it never mentions that the President can declassify. If Q is correct and POTUS wants to introduce evidence by the book, he is going to need someone else to do the declassing. The way I read it is POTUS is only involved if an agency is appealing the declass, and the one’s that need to request the declass are the ones behind all the redactions. Any lawfags confirm or correct?

 

PART 3—DECLASSIFICATION AND DOWNGRADING

Sec. 3.1.

Authority for Declassification.

(a) Information shall be declassified as soon as it no longer meets the standards for classification under this order.

(b) Information shall be declassified or downgraded by:

(1) the official who authorized the original classification, if that official

is still serving in the same position and has original classification authority;

(2) the originator’s current successor in function, if that individual has original classification authority;

(3) a supervisory official of either the originator or his or her successor in function, if the supervisory official has original classification authority; or (4) officials delegated declassification authority in writing by the agency head or the senior agency official of the originating agency.

(c) The Director of National Intelligence (or, if delegated by the Director of National Intelligence, the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence) may, with respect to the Intelligence Community, after consultation with the head of the originating Intelligence Community element or department, declassify, downgrade, or direct the declassification or downgrading of information or intelligence relating to intelligence sources, methods, or activities.

(d) It is presumed that information that continues to meet the classification requirements under this order requires continued protection. In some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect such information may be outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in these cases the information should be declassified. When such questions arise, they shall be referred to the agency head or the senior agency official. That official will determine, as an exercise of discretion, whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the damage to the national security that might reasonably be expected from disclosure. This provision does not:

(1) amplify or modify the substantive criteria or procedures for classification; or

(2) create any substantive or procedural rights subject to judicial review.

(e) If the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office determines that information is classified in violation of this order, the Director may require the information to be declassified by the agency that originated the classification. Any such decision by the Director may be appealed to the

President through the National Security Advisor. The information shall remain classified pending a prompt decision on the appeal.

(f) The provisions of this section shall also apply to agencies that, under the terms of this order, do not have original classification authority, but had such authority under predecessor orders.

(g) No information may be excluded from declassification under section 3.3 of this order based solely on the type of document or record in which it is found. Rather, the classified information must be considered on the basis of its content.

(h) Classified nonrecord materials, including artifacts, shall be declassified as soon as they no longer meet the standards for classification under this order.

(i) When making decisions under sections 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 of this order, agencies shall consider the final decisions of the Panel.

Anonymous ID: a45111 Sept. 15, 2018, 7:45 p.m. No.3040539   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0558 >>0615 >>0664

>>3040387

I agree POTUS can declass anything, but that would set a bad precedent going forward. No better than Obummer unmasking hundreds before finally leaving. If going to do it by the book, this chapter says there are only 4 people who can declass.

(1) the official who authorized the original classification (STROZK?)), if that official

is still serving in the same position and has original classification authority;

(2) the originator’s current successor in function, if that individual has original classification authority (RR?);

(3) a supervisory official of either the originator or his or her successor in function, if the supervisory official has original classification authority (SESSIONS RECUSED); or

(4) officials delegated declassification authority in writing by the agency head or the senior agency official of the originating agency (AGENCY HEAD – WRAY?).

Anonymous ID: a45111 Sept. 15, 2018, 7:56 p.m. No.3040664   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0695

>>3040539

>>3040615

It was written by lawyers to be read by lawyers and it clearly does not say POTUS is to be the one to declass. You cannot stop reading after Sec 1.7.

I wish POTUS would declass it all, but if the plan is by the book, this book does not help the cause unless someone else requests the declass.

Anonymous ID: a45111 Sept. 15, 2018, 8:09 p.m. No.3040823   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3040695

I wish POTUS would declass it all, but if the plan is by the book, this book does not help the cause unless someone else requests the declass. Not just me saying this.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/07/the-declassification-conundrum/

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/11/white-house-lawyers-reviewing-the-declassification-conundrum/