FYI space between sentences is not shills.
Maybe some are..
But then you actually not clusterfuck together several points of the argument together in a van full of vodka on go on the highway either.
And if they cant attack the argument they attack the person or way it is done.
That my gents.. is shill.
Light is not empty.
I think you are ref to neutrinos.
As you prob are aware light bends when mass in in it`s electromagnetic field.
So it responds to mass by its own mass.
It can also bend around objects.
Light can move trough objects aswell but not the visible spectrum that we can see.
Gamma, xray etc.
Light does indeed have particle/s.
I wont argue with you further.
But dont come her with a "projection" because you d not know it yet.
Spiritual light?
I get that.
It still has mass.
For something to be measured by th source/all or even you if u astral…
It must come from somthing right?
And that something needs and must have a point of referance right?
An A—B point of referance or else you would not be abl to remember it, travel it or see/measure it.
So it does indeed MUST as an absolute minimum have to have a particle no matter what you believe to be true.
Nothing can be nothing. It must have a point of ref.
I have aleady expanded friend.
haha no..
It dont work that way. it dont get stuck.
its not glue..
a particle dont get stuck if its a light photon.
it emmits light.
it is a frequency. wave until that wave hits an object.
then it gets a particle.
That particle goes trough it.
but firstly it expells that light on that surface.
So if no particle..
The red car standing in the sun wont bet a bad reddish colour after some time no?
and that camera u got have the chip exposed to all light all th time?
Or is it a shutter on it?