Okay, so let's say they put a "plane" hologram around a cruise missile – how do they produce plane-shaped entry holes in the building facades?
>They had explosives in the building that blew the hole in the facade.
This is the part that doesn't compute for me. The plane-shaped entry holes in the building facades are bent inwards. You couldn't produce them with explosives planted on the inside.
>Why do Dems push so hard to get their people out to vote early?
Answer should be obvious – they can use it to drive up turnout. If they can target "their" voters and get them to vote early, they lock in that number of votes, and then they can focus on the remainder for GOTV efforts on election day.
They've got a lot of Soros-funded infrastructure to track "their" voters and push them to vote, but their voters tend to be flaky. On average it's harder to get them to turn out on a single day. So the advantages for them should be obvious.
So, cruise missile in the middle of a "plane" hologram, and some kind of directed energy weapon to make the hole look more like a plane? I guess it wouldn't put it past them, but that goes well beyond a conventional explanation.
I'm obviously open to accepting that all kinds of fuckery were afoot. Just haven't seen a good explanation for how the entry holes were shaped, apart from some kind of super-advanced directed energy weapons capabilities.
The problem is, shaped charges on the inside of the building don't produce entry holes bent inwards.