>>3042443 (lb)

I don't follow LR

But I saw that they were attacking Mitchell earlier this week and saved the tweet

What LR said is false and the Schipp matter is related to Posobiec naming persons as part of JTFMAGA w/o their consent / just like with Drake

The false accusations began after Q called Posobiec out

>>3042598

>I haven't seen this. Hmmm….

Was presented last winter / December I think on CBTS

Most anons deemed it fake

I have no opinion on it

>>3042626

>>3042622

It just showed up in my twitter feed…here you go

Not OP of book photo / just saw it on my twitter as you asked for sauce…

twitter.com/mamaksully3/status/1041193470218719234

>>3042646

>>3042646

>GEN FLYNN LOVES JACK CERNOVICH

What choice did he have but to take the pic?

Gateway Pundit was a sponsor of the event

Posobiec and his Mossad crew just tried to capitalize on it

>>3042684

>THIS RETARD IS CLAIMING POSOBIEC HAS COMPLETE CONTROL OF GEN FLYNN'S WILL

A gentleman of General Flynn's caliber would take a photo with the sponsor of the event he is being honored at

It's called manners

You should get some

>>3042650

>>3042721

Confirmed shopped

Someone found the original pics of FLOTUS and posted last night / don't know which bread

>>3042726

>>3042726

>i wish they would give us a job. have patriots and people that love the country, im in.

twitter.com/NSAGov/status/1040630065116143618

www.intelligencecareers.gov/NSA/nsacareers.html?platform=hootsuite

>>3042744

>JPoso is playing his role anons. Taking many hits from anons while he’s at it.

Nope

Your comment is not even logical in regards to covert operations

>>3042797

>>3042797

>James o kefe new movie coming next week

Be awesome if one of his videos exposes the Fake MAGA's that like to buddy up to him like Fairbanks

That would be an exceptional plot twist

>>3042822

>controlled opposition.

Not what was stated and not the same as being disinfo for the cause as disinfo for Mossad

>>3042915

>He knows damn well what those words mean. And what him writing them would cause.

Q also directed us to the twitter account where the signed books were posted

>>3042964

>Actually, the person posted the books a day later there BECAUSE Q drew attention to the account the day before.

That is factually incorrect

One of the books was posted at 4 44 pm PDT

Q's post regarding that account was the SAME day at 5 03 pm PDT

So the book posting was a response to the tweet Q linked to PRIOR to Q posting about it