Anonymous ID: 8d19cb Sept. 16, 2018, 1:51 a.m. No.3043376   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3794

 

>>3041921 (pb) Anon commentary on history book changes over the years

Thanks very much for researching this. Very Important Topic. This could actually be the topic of a graduate level thesis.

>pointless wars that had no positive effect on society.

And why were they pointless? Maybe because they were instigated by hidden powers secretly behind the scenes to set forces in motion that wouldn't have occurred without that secret manipulation?

Also notice how the overall theme was changed from one of heroism & service to one of victimization & rebellion? Notice how the cultural shift over this time has reflected the same?

Critical to recognize that the most effective subervsion always works at this level - a bottoms-up approach that emanates from the top-down through covert meansโ€ฆeating away at the pillars of society one by one until those guardians (in this case, the individual educators) are taken down one-by-one by a thousand cuts & then replaced by the minions who serve the subversion.

These subtle changes in textbooks presaged the No Child Left Behind act so that by the time it was enacted, those minions had already been put in their proper places (see the "teacher" in Bush in the school video on 9/11 for a perfect example).

This is exactly what JFK discussed in the "Secret Socities" speech. He was able to see this clearly back then in a way to express it so eloquently. Yet it was expressed in a setting where it fell on deaf ears.

Now that information is able to travel so quickly & easily across the world, let us not make the same mistake again.

Anonymous ID: 8d19cb Sept. 16, 2018, 2:13 a.m. No.3043440   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3445 >>3467

>>3043398

Read a great piece recently on the secret history of the Civil War on how Russia greatly helped the Union effort by sailing their ships over to protect the Port of SF from Confederate takeover. It was a major front that's never discussed. This was one of the reasons why the Rots took out the Czars' entire family out years later (as revenge).

Fascinating stuff. Will post if I can find again.

Anonymous ID: 8d19cb Sept. 16, 2018, 2:33 a.m. No.3043499   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3043385

Already evidence to suggest that the hard work will pay itself off several times over. Have a feeling the censorship police are going to regret their actions, as they didn't realize that some were just waiting for this moment to activate.

Sleep soundly.

Anonymous ID: 8d19cb Sept. 16, 2018, 3:04 a.m. No.3043619   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3816 >>3831 >>4050 >>4072

>>3043429

It really is good. Also this:

>https://fee.org/articles/missing-chapters-from-american-history/

"Because if forced schooling is even to appear to. succeed, what is taught, and the books used to teach it must be geared toward the lowest common denominator of students. Because each step downward in the desperate effort to reach this lowest common denominator has ramifying effects which extend upward to affect the following years of schooling, the quality of teachers, the quality of administrators, and so on. Because ultimately, even the writers of textbooks will be deficient in that level of understanding which is necessary to produce quality textbooks, even if there were any significant market for them."

 

This entire movement toward placating the LCD is the very heart of the subversion. Our innate human nature to help our fellows has been manipulated to become the main tool in the effort to enslave us all.

If you look at the 3 top producers of textbooks, all of the owners could be considered cabalistic. This scumbag owns one of them, McGraw Hill.

 

https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/this-day-in-buyout-history-apollo-conducts-a-textbook-takeover

Anonymous ID: 8d19cb Sept. 16, 2018, 3:53 a.m. No.3043758   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3794

>>3043575

>do it for overton-window purposes, to keep the outer edge as close to where we need to be as possible, given that the opposite edge is always pressing too. (i.e. countermeasures.)

As someone who has spent most of my life pulling on those outer edges, appreciate & respect this approach. Don't always agree with it, but have learned to adapt to it. It's definitely helped to refine the processes on which to approach topics that appear on the surface to be either not relevant or too "out there".

Curation is a very delicate underrated art, and it's encouraging to know that there are those practicing it here that have given the matter considerate thought.

Thanks Baker.