>>3045993

>Watch CA

>>3045946

Sometimes a + is just a +.

Context.

>>3046178

>>3046165

Has either of you READ the articles? It's laid out pretty clearly.

>Our memes are going to need to get very sophisticated.

This i agree with.

>>3046237

The truth, no. Hinting enough to tell us what we need to do to get around the (Rosetta) filters, yes.

The biggest hint: optical character recognition (OCR) will be used. Last I checked, OCR isn't always very accurate. So it could go really wrong for FB. By CARPET BOMBING memes, both Rosetta AND the human readers will be overwhelmed.

>>3046237

Also, using Deep Dream memes can help

>>3046322

It worked with reddit, it can work for FB & TWIT. Also, some of the more liberal folks will get caught in the cross fire too, they'll definitely scream bloody murder once their memes are "fact-checked"

>>3046344 I agree

>>3046345 If they're going to go through all of this trouble, well, we'll make them WORK FOR IT, only to paint themselves into a corner

>How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?

>>3046420

>>3046256

NOTABLE

How to defeat Facebook's use of optical character recognition + AI to read text on memes

DEEP DREAM THEIR AI TO SLEEP