dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

>>3047184

Totally off topic, but I've been thinking a bit about John Bolton's speech last week condemning the International Criminal Court. Quick vid link for reference:

https://youtu.be/yrastGeoSuE?t=37s

Bolton, on behalf of POTUS, uses some pretty strong language in this speech:

"The United States will use any means necessary to protect our citizens, and those of our allies, from unjust prosecution by this illegitimate court. We will not cooperate with the ICC; we will provide no assistance to the ICC, and we certainly will not join the ICC. We will let the ICC die on its own. After all, for all intents and purposes, the ICC is already dead to us."

That is about as strong of a rebuke as one can provide. But why?

Obviously, the ICC is a corrupt, Globalist institution that doesn't have America's interests in mind. That said, it seems like there might be further reasons why such strong condemnation would be offered now, beyond just the fact that the ICC wants to prosecute US Servicemembers complicit in enhanced interrogation.

Here's a theory:

If POTUS plans to ultimately declassify the true nature of 9/11, then it will come out that members of US Gov't were complicit in this attach, and it will further highlight the illegality of US military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, etc. If we are cooperating with the ICC, that would mean that a bunch of unamerican, unelected, Globalist bureaucrats will be responsible for deciding who is to be held accountable for these acts and any subsequent war crimes.

This would be totally unacceptable, and therefore we need to make sure that US Military tribunals and the (cleaned up) US Justice System will be responsible for holding to account those responsible. Additionally, this gives us greater control to assure service members who were simply following what they believed to be lawful orders will not have their lives destroyed.

I'm not certain of the above, but it seems to make a lot of sense to me.