>>3052801 (lb)

This is good anon. Tired of them trying to slant it that way.

>>3053289

To add to it, with all the negative articles stating that someone posting on the internet is a supposed government insider perpetuating this, why wouldn't they be calling for an investigation themselves? If it's so muh dangerous, you'd think MSM would want it truly exposed.

>>3053473

Kek, good point anon.

>>3053582

Thanks concernfag