Parents of Kavanuagh accuser possible current address:
27 Bedford St, Rehoboth, DE 19971
27 Bedford St, Dewey Beach, DE 19971 ; 27 Bedford St, Rehoboth Bch, DE 19971
Resident Name Phone More Information
Paula K Blasey (302) 227-2579
Ralph G Blasey (302) 227-4829
Do we know occupations? Retired?
Wasn't Ralph a lawyer?
More crumbs & Links on the Kavanaugh setup:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/16/transparent-political-hit-job-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-blasey-activated-to-advance-35-year-old-accusations/
Turns out Kavanaugh was first mentioned by magazines as a possible Romney SCOTUS nominee in 2012. The same year she had her therapy and "remembered" the fake attack.
More puzzle pieces on the Kavanaugh set up here:
https://twitter.com/RAMRANTS
May need a big map for everything when all is said and done
It gets better, her brother apparently works for the law firm that is representing Fusion GPS.
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/BREAKING-NEWS-Christine-Ford-s-PARENTS-Were-Defendants-in-a-1996-Foreclosure-Case-Guess-who-s-Mom/5-2147297/
ALSO that same firm wrote a hit piece on Kavanaugh BEFORE the Christine story broke
https://www.antitrustadvocate.com/2018/09/10/a-look-at-judge-kavanaughs-antitrust-record/
Dated Sept 10th orig Aug 24th
We may need a timeline. Can anyone grab the pdf?
http://intranet.baker-hostetler.com/news1/Kavanaugh_p02.pdf
"BakerHostetler Partner Carl Hittinger and Associate Tyson Herrold authored an article published Aug. 24, 2018, by The Legal Intelligencer. The article, “Is Judge Kavanaugh a Fan of Antitrust Laws? Let’s Take a Look,” examines the limited antitrust jurisprudence record of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who has been nominated to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the U.S. Supreme Court. Hittinger and Herrold examine two Kavanaugh dissenting opinions in antitrust cases and note that other judges on the D.C. Circuit have strongly criticized him for his naivety on antitrust issues and his seeming disregard for stare decisis and the rule of law that may indicate a willingness to take issue with other Supreme Court precedent. They also point out that Kavanaugh’s dissents illustrate his view that the antitrust laws are designed to promote consumer welfare and business efficiency at the expense of competition when those two goals are at odds, which is reminiscent of onetime Supreme Court nominee Judge Robert Bork’s controversial thinking."