>>3060821 (lb)
That's fair anon. But, Q team would know that his posts are designed to lead us to certain conclusions and that after enough time, we would become disheartened and frustrated. To consistently mislead your most ardent followers is NOT a smart play.
Yes. How this doesn't concern people or frustrate the hell out of anons is beyond me.
Legit questions and discussion could be had but most would rather call us shills, dumbfucks, and go on following totally uncritically. Where is the Autism? I thought Anons were supposed to be smarter and ask hard questions? Looks like a lot of blind support to me. Lets put together a list of all of Q's timeline posts that didn't materialize…because there is a lot of them. It is legitimate to ask how many times can predictions not come true before we start stepping back to ask why. That isn't shilling. It is called due diligence.
Dear God don't let this be another tease. If it is real, then HELL YES! LET'S DO THIS! If it goes dud again, I won't recover.