>>3060342–PB for the bots out there
>There is zero intrigue.
>
>The allegation's sole purpose was to give Collins cover to vote NO.
>
>KAVANAUGH will not be confirmed unless the accuser is proven to be lying.
>
>This is why SHE will not testify in hearings (although she says she will).
>
>If she is a proven liar and Collins backed a proven liar without DUE PROCESS - then Collins will be removed.
>
>Get it?
NO!
Collins needs cover to vote no. (WHY would a DEM need that)
If accuser=liar K gets approved.(Gets due process–charges=true)
NO DUE PROCESS
Accuser charges = UNKNOWN
So Collins has cover by backing an undocumented accusation. NO DUE PROCESS for K is OK?
Has Collins already backed accuser?
Clear as fucking mud.