>>3067931

Kennedy left because he didn't have a choice. RBG will be leaving, also, because she won't have a choice. RBG because of the Lynch promise. Kennedy, not really sure about that one. I don't think Q's ever clarified that statements.

Multiple meanings exist, and I still think Q's post is in reference to 2 letters to ALL of the Supreme Court, but reading it from a different perspective does seem to lead you down the path that 2 justices are going to get shit-canned as a result (Kennedy being one of the 2).

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1926578.html#1927025

>His choice?

No

>Remember, Kennedy was the swing vote.

>No more.

No more court fuckery and mistranslation of the Constitution.

>Locked & Loaded.

>RBG next.

There ya have it.

>Q

The other way to read Q's post, of course is:

2 letters to the Supreme Court. The letters are classified, of course, implicating recusal/unrecusal procedures for the AG, with probably some mirror reference to some dirt on these 2 justices as an EXAMPLE.

Nicely done, anon!!!

>>3068110

Right here, anon:

>>3068440

>>3068281

>>3068332

>>3068593

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege

Read up. Basically, there's a conflict here between precedent, and an EO signed by Obama in 2010.

>The purpose of the state secrets privilege is to prevent courts from revealing state secrets in the course of civil litigation (in criminal cases, the Classified Information Procedures Act serves the same purpose). The government may intervene in any civil suit, including when it is not a party to the litigation, to ask the court to exclude state secrets evidence. While the courts may examine such evidence closely, in practice they generally defer to the Executive Branch. Once the court has agreed that evidence is subject to the state secrets privilege, it is excluded from the litigation. Often, as a practical matter, the plaintiff cannot continue the suit without the privileged information, and drops the case. Recently, courts have been more inclined to dismiss cases outright, if the subject matter of the case is a state secret.[8]

vs this:

>>>/patriotsfight/239

https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#239

This is why Q keeps saying FISA DECLAS brings down the House (Obama's WH). All of them will go down as they committed treason/sedition to prevent the court from doing their fucking jobs.

These people really are fucking stupid.