>>3068723

Agree.

I did find this post by Q though which could be relevant:

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: bbec14 No.1055924 📁

Apr 15 2018 18:57:32 (EST)

>>1055826

Side by side graphics are important.

To be clear, LL was promised the Supreme Court position of RBG.

Coordinated.

Planned.

RBG big problems.

Q

RBG big problems.

What did that mean?

>>3068843

It's not unusual for a lib on SC to retire when D is in office, or same for conservative SC/R. That's not a scandal.

But "big problems" implies some type of scandal.