Think of it like sourdough. You use the old dough to make the new bread. And the dough for the new bread becomes the source for the dough for the next bread.
>Think of anons who will have missed some threads and look to Notable Posts for an update of what's happened / has been discovered.
No, that's the significance of the notables in the bread. The dough is the source for the bread, which bakers use to build the next bread. They then leave that bread's dough in the new bread for the next dough (to build on to make the following bread). The next time a baker posts the dough, download it and open it in a text editor. You'll see it is just the text file used to make the first four posts, one of which (the notables) changes every bread.
>>3069603 If the above does not make sense to you, let me know what does not make sense and I'll try to explain it a different way.
No, they never think that. Criminals never think of consequences of getting caught. If they considered the consequences, they would not commit the crime (and therefore not be criminals).
Look at the first four posts in ANY bread. The dough is the source file for those. So, when the baker posts the dough, it is just the text file for the four posts above it (ignoring any shithead anon posts that were added during the bake).
Notice how some things are red, and some are bold… etc. If you did not have the dough, you'd have to do those every bread by copypasta of previous first four posts. Also, copypasta of a post gets extra line breaks which would have to be removed… having the source text file makes the breads more consistent. The baker must update notables, add Q posts, perhaps remove old notables to the past notables section because posts are limited to the number of characters… quite a few things.
Also, bakers will correct typos or mistakes from previous bakes. Old dough is pretty much useless. Only the most recent dough is useful. I've had to rebuild new doughs on very old doughs when an error occurs and is not caught. We had a rash of bad characters for the dashes for a while. Some baker's text editor was not rendering them as dashes but as unicode codes. I had to go back about 8 breads to find the previous "good" dough, which I copypasta'ed into the fresh dough to correct it.
What if by "servers," Q was talking about those who serve the spirit cooking results? Just a thought that has occurred to me in the past.
No… you downloaded the dough for this bread. Bread is what the collected crumbs (which go into the dough) make when the new "bread" is created. Breads are threads, while the dough is merely the source for the first four posts of the new bread. Chan formatting allows for links using two angle brackets. That's just parsing of the text in any post. No different than any linked post in any bread, such as the link I did above when I "answered" your post. You linked to my previous answer in your post. How did you do that? You clicked the post number, and voila! the angle brackets appeared.
If I'm still around, I'll take it next bread. I should be here, but you never know when IRL will interfere.
Baker notable
The redacted pages that will be declas…
Thanks for pulling these up, original anon.
>i might be able to do another one after the next
The next bread will take at least four hours unless Q posts again.
If you post an updated dough, I'll take it now if you need relief. If you want to stay through to the end of this bread, that works, too.
No. I'm a used-to-be-Baker. Baked yesterday for the first time in a long time. I got relief after only a reasonable delay, so figured I'd take another today if no one else stepped up. I saw yesterday that Clam moved back to days (as predicted at the beginning of the Summer when CB moved to mids).